Settings Results in 4 milliseconds

Rust Foundation Apologizes For Proposed Trademark Changes, Promises Improvement
Rust Foundation Apologizes For Proposed Trademark ...

"The Rust Foundation on Monday apologized for confusion caused by the organization's proposed trademark policy changes," reports the Register. The Foundation now says their proposed policy "clearly needs improvement" and "there are many valid critiques of the initial draft," promising to address them and adopt a more transparent process (with a report summarizing the feedback soon). From the Register's report The foundation, which provides financial and legal support for the memory-safe programming language, had proposed fresh rules on the use of the word Rust and its logo, which included the recommendation that people not use 'Rust' in their Rust crate names, eg vulture-rs would be preferred over vulture-rust. These draft changes triggered a backlash... Over the weekend, Rust creator Graydon Hoare voiced support for the community's objections in a Reddit discussion thread, in response to a post by programmer Andrew Gallant, a former member of the Rust moderation team, who argued the new policy was not all that different from the old one. "Open them up side by side — old and new — and look at what they each say about, specifically, package names, project names, repos or websites using the word 'rust', or modified versions of the logo used for small groups or projects," wrote Hoare. "These are specifically the things people are upset about, because they all changed from 'acceptable' to 'prohibited' when 'clarifying' the policy. And those are specifically things that everyone in the community does, and has done, for years. There are zillions of packages, projects, repos, websites and groups using the names and logo this way, as the old policy said they could. The new policy tells them all to stop." Long-time open source advocate Bruce Perens told the Register that Rust's trademark policy "goes far awry of fair use which is legally permitted. Books on Rust will always have its name in their title, commercial products will be advertised as being written in Rust, being compatible with Rust, or compiling Rust. But the policy attempts to deny permission for these things. A proper trademark policy prevents others from representing that their product is Rust or is endorsed by the trademark holder of Rust. That's really as much as you can ever enforce, so there's no sense in a policy that asks for more." The Register also spoke to Ashley Williams, a former member of the Rust core team and the original executive director and founder of the Rust Foundation, who argued upheaval in Rust's governance over the past year led to a team with less experience dealing with the Rust community. "I think a couple of very passionate people participated in the trademark working group and they didn't involve a lot of people who have even basic experience interacting with the community. So really classic community behaviors ended up getting prohibited in that [draft] policy. And that's really why everybody got upset. The policy ultimately said, 'a thing that you do all the time as a way of contributing to the Rust community is now against our policy.'" Read more of this story at Slashdot.


How to make Web Application valuable
Category: Computer Programming

Every minute a user spends on your Web Application is valuable tim ...


Views: 0 Likes: 26
Azure previews powerful and scalable virtual machine series to accelerate generative AI
Azure previews powerful and scalable virtual machi ...

Delivering on the promise of advanced AI for our customers requires supercomputing infrastructure, services, and expertise to address the exponentially increasing size and complexity of the latest models. At Microsoft, we are meeting this challenge by applying a decade of experience in supercomputing and supporting the largest AI training workloads to create AI infrastructure capable of massive performance at scale. The Microsoft Azure cloud, and specifically our graphics processing unit (GPU) accelerated virtual machines (VMs), provide the foundation for many generative AI advancements from both Microsoft and our customers. “Co-designing supercomputers with Azure has been crucial for scaling our demanding AI training needs, making our research and alignment work on systems like ChatGPT possible.”—Greg Brockman, President and Co-Founder of OpenAI.  Azure's most powerful and massively scalable AI virtual machine series Today, Microsoft is introducing the ND H100 v5 VM which enables on-demand in sizes ranging from eight to thousands of NVIDIA H100 GPUs interconnected by NVIDIA Quantum-2 InfiniBand networking. Customers will see significantly faster performance for AI models over our last generation ND A100 v4 VMs with innovative technologies like 8x NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPUs interconnected via next gen NVSwitch and NVLink 4.0 400 Gb/s NVIDIA Quantum-2 CX7 InfiniBand per GPU with 3.2Tb/s per VM in a non-blocking fat-tree network NVSwitch and NVLink 4.0 with 3.6TB/s bisectional bandwidth between 8 local GPUs within each VM 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors PCIE Gen5 host to GPU interconnect with 64GB/s bandwidth per GPU 16 Channels of 4800MHz DDR5 DIMMs Delivering exascale AI supercomputers to the cloud Generative AI applications are rapidly evolving and adding unique value across nearly every industry. From reinventing search with a new AI-powered Microsoft Bing and Edge to AI-powered assistance in Microsoft Dynamics 365, AI is rapidly becoming a pervasive component of software and how we interact with it, and our AI Infrastructure will be there to pave the way. With our experience of delivering multiple-ExaOP supercomputers to Azure customers around the world, customers can trust that they can achieve true supercomputer performance with our infrastructure. For Microsoft and organizations like Inflection, NVIDIA, and OpenAI that have committed to large-scale deployments, this offering will enable a new class of large-scale AI models. "Our focus on conversational AI requires us to develop and train some of the most complex large language models. Azure's AI infrastructure provides us with the necessary performance to efficiently process these models reliably at a huge scale. We are thrilled about the new VMs on Azure and the increased performance they will bring to our AI development efforts."—Mustafa Suleyman, CEO, Inflection. AI at scale is built into Azure’s DNA. Our initial investments in large language model research, like Turing, and engineering milestones such as building the first AI supercomputer in the cloud prepared us for the moment when generative artificial intelligence became possible. Azure services like Azure Machine Learning make our AI supercomputer accessible to customers for model training and Azure OpenAI Service enables customers to tap into the power of large-scale generative AI models. Scale has always been our north star to optimize Azure for AI. We’re now bringing supercomputing capabilities to startups and companies of all sizes, without requiring the capital for massive physical hardware or software investments. “NVIDIA and Microsoft Azure have collaborated through multiple generations of products to bring leading AI innovations to enterprises around the world. The NDv5 H100 virtual machines will help power a new era of generative AI applications and services.”—Ian Buck, Vice President of hyperscale and high-performance computing at NVIDIA.  Today we are announcing that ND H100 v5 is available for preview and will become a standard offering in the Azure portfolio, allowing anyone to unlock the potential of AI at Scale in the cloud. Sign up to request access to the new VMs. Learn more about AI at Microsoft Reinventing search with a new AI-powered Microsoft Bing and Edge, your copilot for the web. Introducing GitHub Copilot your AI pair programmer. Introducing Microsoft Dynamics 365 Copilot, bringing next-generation AI to every line of business. Azure OpenAI Service Azure Machine Learning Service Microsoft AI at Scale NVIDIA Teams With Microsoft to Build Massive Cloud AI Computer


Contract Assignment - Senior Programmer / PHP Deve ...
Category: Jobs

Ampcus Inc. is a Global leader in end-to-end IT Business Solutions and Services with latest techn ...


Views: 190 Likes: 73
How to increase Speed of Social Media application
Category: Computer Programming

Speed of the Web Application is really ...


Views: 0 Likes: 40
Embracing ?????: Programming as Imitation of the Divine
Embracing ????? Programming as Imitation of the D ...

Within the field of software development, we are prone to gazing upon the future – new libraries, new tools. But from where did we come? The philosophical foundation of the field is largely absent from the contemporary zeitgeist, but our work is deeply rooted in the philosophical traditions of not only Logic, but Ontology, Identity, Ethics and so on. Daily, the programmer struggles with not only their implementation of logic but the ontological and identity questions of classifying and organizing their reality into a logical program. What is a User? What are its properties? What actions can be taken on it? “Oh the mundanity!” – cries the programmer. But in-deed, as we will explore here – you are doing God’s work! Because the work of programmers is not too dissimilar from that of philosophers throughout history, we can look to them for guidance on the larger questions of our own tradition. In this piece, we will focus mainly on the ancient Greeks and their metaphysical works. Guided by their knowledge, we can better incorporate Reason and Logic into our programs and strive to escape Plato’s Cave (https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_cave). Furthermore, because the results of our work is our reason manifested into reality, we must suffer under the greater burden of responsibility to aim towards the divine Reason. ????? [T]he spermatikos logos in each man provides a common, non-confessional basis in each man, whether as a natural or supernatural gift from God (or both), by which he is called to participate in God’s Reason or [?????], from which he obtains a dignity over the brute creation, and out of which he discovers and obtains normative judgments of right and wrong (https//lexchristianorum.blogspot.com/2010/03/st-justin-martyr-spermatikos-logos-and.html) The English word logic is rooted in the Ancient Greek ????? (Logos) – meaning “word, discourse or reason”. ????? is related to the Ancient Greek ???? (légo) – meaning “I say”, a cognate with the Latin legus or “law”. Going even further back, ????? derives from the PIE root *le?- which can have the meanings “I put in order, arrange, gather, I choose, count, reckon, I say, speak”. (https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos) The concept of the ????? has been studied and applied philosophically throughout history – going back to Heraclitus around 500 BC. Heraclitus described the ????? as the common Reason of the world and urged people to strive to know and follow it. “For this reason it is necessary to follow what is common. But although the ????? is common, most people live as if they had their own private understanding.” (Diels–Kranz, 22B2) With Aristotelian, Platonic and early Stoic thought, the ????? as universal and objective Reason and Logic was further considered and defined. ????? was seen by the Stoics as an active, material phenomenon driving nature and animating the universe. The ????? spe?µat???? (“logos spermatikos”) was, according to the Stoics, the principle, generative Reason acting in inanimate matter in the universe. Plutarch, a Platonist, wrote that the ????? was the “go-between” between God and humanity. The Stoics believed that humans each possess a part of the divine ?????. The ????? was also a fundamental philosophical foundation for early Christian thought (see John 11-3). The ????? is impossible to concisely summarize. But for the purpose of this piece, we can consider it the metaphysical (real but immaterial) universal Reason; an infinite source of Logic and Truth into which humans tap when they reason about the world. Imitation of the Divine In so far as the spirit is also a kind of ‘window on eternity’… it conveys to the soul a certain influx divinus… and the knowledge of a higher system of the world (Jung, Carl. Mysterium Coniunctionis) What is “imitation of the divine”? One could certainly begin by considering what the alternative would be. A historical current has existed in the philosophical tradition of humanity’s opportunity and responsibility to turn to and harness the divine ????? in their daily waking life. With language and thought we reason about the material and immaterial. As Rayside and Campbell declared in their defense of traditional logic in the field of Computer Science – “But if what is real and unchanging (the intelligible structure in things) is the measure of what we think about it (concept) and speak (word) about it, then it too is a work of reason not our reason, for our reason is the measured, but of Reason.” (Rayside, D, and G Campbell. Aristotle and Object-Oriented Programming Why Modern Students Need Traditional Logic. https//dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/331795.331862.) Plato, in his theory of the tripartite soul, understood that the ideal human would not suffer passions (??µ?e?d??, literally “anger-kind”) or desires (?p???µ?t????) but be led by the ????? innate in the soul (????st????). When human reasoning is concordant with Reason, for a moment, Man transcends material reality and is assimilated with the divine (the ?????). “Hence, so many of the great thinkers who have gone before us posited that the natural way in which the human mind gets to God is in a mediated way — via things themselves, which express God to the extent that they can.” (Rayside, Campbell) God here is the representative of the ????? – humanity can achieve transcendental knowledge by consideration (in the deepest sense of the word) of the things around them. The Programmer Assimilated It is simply foolish to pretend that human reason is not concerned with meaning, or that programming is not an application of human reason (Rayside, Campbell) The programmer must begin by defining things – material or conceptual. “We are unable to reason or communicate effectively if we do not first make the effort to know what each thing is.” (Rayside, Campbell) By considering the ontological questions of the things in our world, in order to represent them accurately (and therefore ethically) in our programs, the programmer enters into the philosophical praxis. Next, the programmer adds layers of identity and logic on top of their ontological discovery, continuing in the praxis. But the programmer takes it a step further – the outcome of their investigation is not only their immaterial thought but, in executing the program, the manifestation of their philosophical endeavor into material reality. The program choreographs trillions of elementary charges through a crystalline maze, harnessing the virtually infinite charge of the Earth, incinerating the remains of starlight-fueled ancient beings in order to realize the reasoning of its programmer. Here the affair enters into the realm of Ethics. “The programmer is attempting to solve a practical problem by instructing a computer to act in a particular fashion. This requires moving from the indicative to the imperative from can or may to should. For a philosopher in the tradition, this move from the indicative to the imperative is the domain of moral science.” (Rayside, Campbell) Any actions taken by the program are the direct ethical responsibility of the programmer. Furthermore, the programmer, as the source of reason and will driving a program, manifesting it into existence, becomes in that instant the ????? spe?µat???? (“logos spermatikos”) incarnate. The programmer’s reason, tapped into the divine Reason (?????), is generated into existence in the Universe and commands reasonable actions of inanimate matter. Feeble Earthworm What sort of freak then is man? How novel, how monstrous, how chaotic, how paradoxical, how prodigious! Judge of all things, feeble earthworm, repository of truth, sink of doubt and error, glory and refuse of the universe! (Pascal, B. (1670). Pensées.) Pascal would be even more perplexed by the paradox of the programmer – in search of Logic and simultaneously materializing their logic; their “repository of truth” a hand emerging from the dirt reaching towards the ?????. Programmers are equals among the feeble earthworms crawling out of Plato’s cave. We enjoy no extraordinary access to Reason and yet bear a greater responsibility as commanders of this technical revolution in which we find ourselves. While the Greeks had an understanding of the weight of their work, their impact was restricted to words. The programmer’s work is a true hypostatization or materialization of the programmer’s reason. As programmers – as beings of Reason at the terminal of this grand system – we should most assuredly concern ourselves with embracing and modeling ourselves and our work after the divine and eternal ?????. The post Embracing ????? Programming as Imitation of the Divine appeared first on Simple Thread.


 The .NET Stacks #18: RC1 is here, the fate of .NET Standard, and F# with Isaac Abraham
The .NET Stacks #18 RC1 is here, the fate of .NE ...

.NET 5 RC1 is hereThis week, Microsoft pushed out the RC1 release for .NET 5, which is scheduled to officially “go live” in early November. RC1 comes with a “go live” license, which means you get production support for it. With that, RC1 versions were released for ASP.NET Core and EF Core as well.I’ve dug deep on a variety of new features in the last few months or so—I won’t  rehash them here. However, the links are worth checking out. For example, Richard Lander goes in-depth on C# 9 records and System.Text.Json.The fate of .NET StandardWhile there are many great updates to the upcoming .NET 5 release, a big selling point is at a higher level the promise of a unified SDK experience for all of .NET. The idea is that you’ll be able to use one platform regardless of your needs—whether it’s Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, WebAssembly, and more. (Because of internal resourcing constraints, Xamarin will join the party in 2021, with .NET 6.)Microsoft has definitely struggled in communicating a clear direction for .NET the last several years, so when you pair a unified experience with predictable releases and roadmaps, it’s music to our ears.You’ve probably wondered what does this mean for .NET Standard? The unified experience is great, but what about when you have .NET Framework apps to support? (If you’re new to .NET Standard, it’s more-or-less a specification where you can target a version of Standard, and all .NET implementations that target it are guaranteed to support all its .NET APIs.)Immo Landwerth shed some light on the subject this week. .NET Standard is being thrown to the .NET purgatory with .NET Framework it’ll still technically be around, and .NET 5 will support it—but the current version, 2.1, will be its last.As a result, we have some new target framework names net5.0, for apps that run anywhere, combines and replaces netcoreapp and netstandard. There’s also net5.0-windows (with Android and iOS flavors to come) for Windows-specific use cases, like UWP.OK, so .NET Standard is still around but we have new target framework names. What should you do? With .NET Standard 2.0 being the last version to support .NET Framework, use netstandard2.0 for code sharing between .NET Framework and other platforms. You can use netstandard2.1 to share between Mono, Xamarin, and .NET Core 3.x, and then net5.0 for anything else (and especially when you want to use .NET 5 improvements and new language features). You’ll definitely want to check out the post for all the details.What a mess .NET Standard promised API uniformity and now we’re even having to choose between that and a new way of doing things. The post lays out why .NET Standard is problematic, and it makes sense. But when you’re trying to innovate at a feverish pace but still support customers on .NET Framework, the cost is complexity—and the irony is that with uniformity with .NET 5, that won’t apply when you have legacy apps to support.Dev Discussions Isaac AbrahamAs much as we all love C#, there’s something that needs reminding from time to time C# is not .NET. It is a large and important part of .NET, for sure, but .NET also supports two other languages Visual Basic and F#. As for F#, it’s been gaining quite a bit of popularity over the last several years, and for good reason it’s approachable, concise, and allows you to embrace a functional-first language while leveraging the power of the .NET ecosystem.I caught up with Isaac Abraham to learn more about F#. After spending a decade as a C# developer, Isaac embraced the power of F# and founded Compositional IT, a functional-first consultancy. He’s also the author of Get Programming with F# A Guide for .NET Developers.I know it’s more nuanced than this but if you could sell F# to C# developers in a sentence or two, how would you do it?F# really does bring the fun back into software development. You’ll feel more productive, more confident and more empowered to deliver high-quality software for your customers.Functional programming is getting a lot of attention in the C# world, as the language is adopting much of its concepts (especially with C# 9). It’s a weird balance trying to have functional concepts in an OO language. How do you feel the balance is going?I have mixed opinions on this. On the one hand, for the C# dev it’s great—they have a more powerful toolkit at their disposal. But I would hate to be a new developer starting in C# for the first time. There are so many ways to do things now, and the feature (and custom operator!) count is going through the roof. More than that, I worry that we’ll end up with a kind of bifurcated C# ecosystem—those that adopt the new features and those that won’t, and worse still the risk of losing the identity of what C# really is.I’m interested to see how it works out. Introducing things like records into C# is going to lead to some new and different design patterns being used that will have to naturally evolve over time.I won’t ask if C# will replace F#—you’ve eloquently written about why the answer is no. I will ask you this, though is there a dividing line of when you should use C# (OO with functional concepts) or straight to F#?I’m not really sure the idea of “OO with functional concepts” really gels, to be honest. Some of the core ideas of FP—immutability and expressions—are kind of the opposite of OO, which is all centered around mutable data structures, statements and side effects. By all means use the features C# provides that come from the FP world and use them where it helps—LINQ, higher order functions, pattern matching, immutable data structures—but the more you try out those features to try what they can do without using OO constructs, the more you’ll find C# pulls you “back.” It’s a little like driving an Audi on the German motorway but never getting out of third gear.My view is that 80% of the C# population today—maybe more—would be more productive and happier in F#. If you’re using LINQ, you favour composition over inheritance, and you’re excited by some of the new features in C# like records, switch expressions, tuples, and so on, F# will probably be a natural fit for you. All of those features are optimised as first-class citizens of the language, whilst things like mutability and classes are possible, but are somewhat atypical.This also feeds back to your other question—I do fear that people will try these features out within the context of OO patterns, find them somehow limited, and leave thinking that FP isn’t worthwhile.Let’s say I’m a C# programmer and want to get into F#. Is there any C# knowledge that will help me understand the concepts, or is it best to clear my mind of any preconceived notions before learning?Probably the closest concept would be to imagine your whole program was a single LINQ query. Or, from a web app—imagine every controller method was a LINQ query. In reality it’s not like that, but that’s the closest I can think of. The fact that you’ll know .NET inside and out is also a massive help. The things to forget are basically the OO and imperative parts of the language classes, inheritance, mutable variables, while loops, and statements. You don’t really use any of those in everyday F# (and believe me, you don’t need any of them to write standard line of business apps).As an OO programmer, it’s so painful always having to worry about “the billion dollar mistake” nulls. We can’t assume anything since we’re mutating objects all over the place and often throw up our hands and do null checks everywhere (although the language has improved in the last few versions). How does F# handle nulls? Is it less painful?For F# types that you create, the language simply says null isn’t allowed, and there’s no such thing as null. So in a sense, the problem goes away by simply removing it from the type system. Of course, you still have to handle business cases of “absence of a value,” so you create optional values—basically a value that can either have something or nothing. The compiler won’t let you access the “something” unless you first “check” that the value isn’t nothing.So, you spend more time upfront thinking about how you model your domain rather than simply saying that everything and anything is nullable. The good thing is, you totally lose that fear of “can this value be null when I dot into it” because it’s simply not part of the type system. It’s kind of like the flow analysis that C# 8 introduced for nullability checks—but instead of flow analysis, it’s much simpler. It’s just a built-in type in the language. There’s nothing magical about it.However, when it comes to interoperating with C# (and therefore the whole BCL), F# doesn’t have any special compiler support for null checks, so developers will often create a kind of “anti-corruption” layer between the “unsafe outside world” and the safe F# layer, which simply doesn’t have nulls. There’s also work going on to bring in support for the nullability surface in the BCL but I suspect that this will be in F# 6.F#, and functional programming in general, emphasizes purity no side effects. Does F# enforce this, or is it just designed with it in mind?No, it doesn’t enforce it. There’s some parts of the language which make it obvious when you’re doing a side effect, but it’s nothing like what Haskell does. For starters, the CLR and BCL don’t have any notion of a side effect, so I think that this would difficult to introduce. It’s a good example of some of the design decisions that F# took when running on .NET—you get all the goodness of .NET and the ecosystem, but some things like this would be challenging to do. In fact, F# has a lot of escape hatches like this. It strongly guides you down a certain path, but it usually has ways that you can do your own thing if you really need to.You still can (and people do) write entire systems that are functionally pure, and the benefits of pure functions are certainly something that most F# folks are aware of (it’s much easier to reason about and test, for example). It just means that the language won’t force you to do it.What is your one piece of programming advice?Great question. I think one thing I try to keep in mind is to avoid premature optimisation and design. Design systems for what you know is going to be needed, with extension points for what will most likely be required. You can never design for every eventuality, and you’ll sometimes get it wrong, that’s life—optimise for what is the most likely outcome.To read the entire interview, head on over to my site.?? Last week in the .NET world?? The Top 3.NET 5 RC 1 is out Richard Lander has the announcement, Jeremy Likness talks about EF updates, and Daniel Roth discusses what’s new for ASP.NET.Immo Landwerth speaks about the future of .NET Standard.Steve Gordon walks through performance optimizations.?? AnnouncementsThere’s a new Learn module for deploying a cloud-native ASP.NET microservice with GitHub Actions.Mark Downie talks about disassembly improvements for optimized managed debugging.Microsoft Edge announces source order viewer in their DevTools.Tara Overfield provides September cumulative updates for the .NET Framework.?? Community and eventsMicrosoft Ignite occurs this Tuesday through Thursday.The .NET Docs Show talks about the dot.net site with Maíra Wenzel.Three .NET community standups this week .NET Tooling finds latent bugs in .NET 5, Entity Framework talks EF Core 5 migrations, and ASP.NET discusses new features for .NET API developers.?? ASP .NET / BlazorShaun Curtis launches a series on building a database application in Blazor.Patrick Smacchia walks through the architecture of a C# game rendered with Blazor, Xamarin, UWP, WPF, and Winforms.David Ramel writes about increased Blazor performance in .NET 5 RC1.Rick Strahl warns about missing await calls for async code in ASP.NET Code middleware.Dominique St-Amand secures an ASP.NET Core Web API with an API key.Vladimir Pecanac discusses how to secure sensitive data locally with ASP.NET Core.David Grace explores why you app might not be working in IIS.?? .NET CoreKay Ewbank discusses the latent bug discovery feature coming with .NET 5.Michal Bialecki executes raw SQL with EF 5.Fredrik Rudberg serves images stored in a database through static URLs using .NET Core 3.1.Shawn Wildermuth talks about hosting Vue in .NET Core.? The cloudVladimir Pecanac configures the Azure Key Vault in ASP.NET Core.Richard Seroter compares the CLI experience between Azure, AWS, and GCP.Jon Gallant walks though the September updates to the Azure SDKs.Christopher Scott introduces the new Azure Tables client libraries.Daniel Krzyczkowski extracts Excel file content with Azure Logic Apps and Azure Functions.Kevin Griffin touts the great performance for Azure Static Web Apps and Azure Functions.Matt Small finds a gotcha you can’t use an Azure Key Vault firewall if you’re in a situation where you’re using App Gateway along with a Key Vault certificate for SSL termination.Gunnar Peipman hosts applications on Azure B-series virtual machines.?? C#Jeremy Clark shows how to see all the exceptions when calling “await Task.WhenAll.”.Jerome Laban uses MSBuild items and properties in C# 9 source generators.?? F#A nice rundown of 10 ways to try F# in the browser.Daniel Bykat talks about the PORK framework and its use with F#.Alican Demirtas discusses string interpolation in F#.Paul Biggar talks about his async adventures.?? ToolsDerek Comartin does a review of MediatR.Tom Deseyn uses OpenAPI with .NET Core.John Juback builds cross-platform desktop apps with Electron.NET.Andrew Lock continues his k8s series by deploying applications with Helm.You can now debug Linux core dumps on the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) or a remote Linux system directly from Visual Studio.Adam Storr uses Project Tye to run .NET worker services.?? XamarinJoe Meyer wires up a fullscreen video background.Khalid Abuhakmeh animates a mic drop.Denys Fiediaiev uses MvvmCross to log with Xamarin.?? PodcastsThe .NET Rocks podcast talks about ML with Zoiner Tejada.Software Engineering Radio talks with Philip Kiely about writing for software developers.The Merge Conflict podcast discusses the new Half type.The Coding Blocks podcast asks is Kubernetes programming?The Azure DevOps Podcast talks with Steve Sanderson about Blazor.?? VideosThe ON .NET Show talks about Steeltoe configuration.Azure Friday talks about Azure landing zones.Scott Hanselman gives us a primer on the cloud.The ASP.NET Monsters send dates from JavaScript to .NET.


What is Computer Programming
Category: Computer Programming

<div class="group w-full text-gray-800 darktext-gray-100 border-b border-black/10 darkborder-gray- ...


Views: 0 Likes: 17

Login to Continue, We will bring you back to this content 0



For peering opportunity Autonomouse System Number: AS401345 Custom Software Development at ErnesTech Email Address[email protected]